Humanity finds a mysterious object buried beneath the lunar surface and sets off to find its origins with the help of HAL 9000, the world’s most advanced super computer.

Credits: TheMovieDb.

Film Cast:

• Dr. David Bowman: Keir Dullea
• Dr. Frank Poole: Gary Lockwood
• Dr. Heywood Floyd: William Sylvester
• HAL 9000 (voice): Douglas Rain
• Moonwatcher: Daniel Richter
• Dr. Andrei Smyslov: Leonard Rossiter
• Elena: Margaret Tyzack
• Dr. Ralph Halvorsen: Robert Beatty
• Dr. Roy Michaels: Sean Sullivan
• Mission Controller: Frank Miller
• Aries-1B Lunar Shuttle Captain: Ed Bishop
• Aries-1B Stewardess: Edwina Carroll
• Stewardess: Heather Downham
• Stewardess: Penny Brahms
• Stewardess: Maggie d’Abo
• Stewardess: Chela Matthison
• Voiceprint Identification Girl: Judy Kiern
• Poole’s Father: Alan Gifford
• Poole’s Mother: Ann Gillis
• Floyd’s daughter (uncredited): Vivian Kubrick
• BBC-12 Announcer: Kenneth Kendall
• Miller: Kevin Scott
• Interviewer Martin Amor: Martin Amor
• Astronaut: Bill Weston
• Astronaut: Glenn Beck
• Astronaut: Mike Lovell
• Ape: John Ashley
• Ape: Jimmy Bell
• Ape: David Charkham
• Ape: Simon Davis
• Ape: Jonathan Daw
• Ape: Péter Delmár
• Ape Attacked by Leopard: Terry Duggan
• Ape: David Fleetwood
• Ape: Danny Grover
• Ape: Brian Hawley
• Ape: David Hines
• Ape: Tony Jackson
• Ape: John Jordan
• Ape: Scott MacKee
• Ape: Laurence Marchant
• Ape: Darryl Paes
• Ape: Joe Refalo
• Ape: Andy Wallace
• Ape: Bob Wilyman
• Ape Killed by Moon-Watcher: Richard Woods
• Young Man (uncredited): S. Newton Anderson
• (uncredited): Sheraton Blount
• (uncredited): Ann Bormann
• (uncredited): Julie Croft
• (uncredited): Penny Francis
• (uncredited): Marcella Markham
• Russian Scientist (uncredited): Irena Marr
• Russian Scientist (uncredited): Krystyna Marr
• (uncredited): Kim Neil
• (uncredited): Jane Pearl
• (uncredited): Penny Pearl
• TMA-1 Site Photographer (uncredited): Burnell Tucker
• TMA-1 Site Technician #1 (uncredited): John Swindells
• TMA-1 Site Technician #2 (uncredited): John Clifford

Film Crew:

• Visual Effects: Stanley Kubrick
• Director of Photography: Geoffrey Unsworth
• Editor: Ray Lovejoy
• Sound mixer: H.L. Bird
• Sound Editor: Winston Ryder
• Novel: Arthur C. Clarke
• Producer: Victor Lyndon
• Additional Photography: John Alcott
• Casting: James Liggat
• Special Effects: Brian Johnson
• Makeup Artist: Stuart Freeborn
• Visual Effects: Douglas Trumbull
• Production Design: Anthony Masters
• Special Effects: Les Bowie
• Set Decoration: Robert Cartwright
• Art Direction: John Hoesli
• Production Design: Ernest Archer
• Production Design: Harry Lange
• Stunts: Bobby Clark
• Construction Coordinator: Dick Frift
• Camera Operator: Kelvin Pike
• Makeup Artist: Graham Freeborn
• Sound Designer: Malcolm Stewart
• Clapper Loader: David Wynn-Jones
• Wardrobe Supervisor: Mary Gibson
• Stunt Coordinator: John Francis
• Assistant Camera: George Watts

Movie Reviews:

• markuspm: There are many great predictions hinting to future (it is from 1968 – can you believe it?) innovations throughout the movie. I might not have found all them because I keep falling asleep while watching it but I will keep trying to find them all.
• izgzhen: I believe that we should call it a modernism show, albeit exhibited in the form of a movie. While it might feel “boring”, it forces you to rethink what philosophical level that a two-hour film can achieve. The focus on questions about life, intelligence, and time, is worth more attention than the sci-fi part (though the special effect of this movie is already way ahead of its time).
• tmdb47633491: The eighth wonder of the world. Easily 30+ viewings since I was a little kid. Nothing new to say here; simply wanted to add another pair of hands to the ocean of applause for my absolute favorite thing, the only indisputably perfect movie, the answer to the question of Is Life Worth Living, Man’s greatest achievement, two thousand one a burger-flipping space odyssey
• Per Gunnar Jonsson: I got this movie recently when it came out on Ultra HD Blu-ray simply because it was missing in my collection and, being a Sci-Fi fan, missing 2001 in my collection simply would not do. It is a movie that was made to rely almost entirely on the visuals. It could be said that it is a visual symphony if that makes sense. Thus it was filmed on 70 mm film and in 6 channel stereo which, at the time was a huge thing. Thanks to this it actually made some sense to transfer this movie to Ultra HD Blu-ray since the originals were really good enough even though the movie was made in 1968.

  I remember watching this movie as a kid and was profoundly disappointed. I thought come on, where’s the adventure, not to mention any form of action? Today I can more appreciate it for what it is. A visually stunning movie. I also can more appreciate the fact that the movie is trying to be scientifically accurate instead of going all out on the fiction part. The parts where gravity, or rather the lack thereof, was portrayed, that was really high tech movie making at the time. I also noticed now, when re-watching it, that all the screens are actually flat which also was really far in the future at the time. Actually it was still pretty much in the future back in 2001.

  However, even today, I have to say that I find the movie excruciatingly boring. It is two and a half hour long and it moves very, very slowly. It takes 50 minutes of movie time before we actually get to the main part of the movie and get onto the Discovery for instance. No matter how great the visuals are, there’s only so much boredom I can stand before it starts to get to me.

  In the last 30 minutes or so the movie starts to become very psychedelic. The part where Bowman is pulled into the vortex, the stargate, is going on forever and in the end it just becomes a blur of headache inducing color effects. The final parts of the movie with the three Bowmans of different ages is just weird.

  So,as this is a non-professional and personal take on the movie I cannot really motivate more than 3 out of 5 stars.

  I hadn’t actually planned to review this movie. Everything has really already been said about it but I could not refrain after having read this crap at Rotten Tomatoes:

  Critics Consensus: One of the most influential of all sci-fi films — and one of the most controversial — Stanley Kubrick’s 2001 is a delicate, poetic meditation on the ingenuity — and folly — of mankind.

  It’s pretty well known that Rotten Tomatoes is the absolutely worst movie rating site around and the so called “critics” are useless culture elite morons with an over-inflated opinion about themselves at best and politically motivated SJW asswipes at worst but still.

  What the hell is controversial about it? Reality check, there’s really nothing controversial about it at all. It is just a fictional story in the future. Then we have that crap “the folly”. What bloody folly? If anything the movie shows a much better future than what we got. A future where the politicians apparently promoted advancement of science and space exploration which is the direct opposite to the money and oxygen wasters we have today.

  Sure, if you indulge too much in smoking funny mushrooms or are politically motivated you can probably “interpret” the hell out of any movie and “find” whatever message you want but it is still bullshit.

  Well, that was my (controversial?) take on 2001.

• Wuchak: _**Inscrutable space science-fiction as cinematic art**_

  The discovery of an ancient extraterrestrial monolith on the Moon leads to a mission to Jupiter, but the astronauts have unexpected complications with their vessel’s onboard computer, HAL 9000. William Sylvester plays an official of US Astronautics in the first hour while Keir Dullea and Gary Lockwood play the two functioning astronauts in the second half.

  Created by Stanley Kubrick (director/writer) and Arthur C. Clarke (writer), “2001: A Space Odyssey” (1968) is an artistic sci-fi film about human evolution, advanced technology, the wonders of space, the routineness of space travel, artificial intelligence and the mystery of extraterrestrial life. It mixes elements of “Planet of the Apes,” which debuted over six weeks earlier, with aspects of “Star Trek: The Motion Picture,” which came out eleven years later and was obviously influenced by this one-of-a-kind movie.

  It begins with the “dawn of man” as a curious introduction before jumping forward to the 21st Century, which has been called the longest flash-forward in cinematic history. The depictions of space travel and life-in-space feel wholly authentic.

  But “2001” is peculiar in that it rejects traditional techniques of narrative cinema and is often a nonverbal experience, which leaves some viewers in awe and others bored. It’s not about conventional thrills, but rather disquieting awe. It’s not easy entertainment, but meditative, transcendent art. The 1985 sequel, “2010: The Year We Make Contact,” is more standard and less ambiguous yet a worthy companion piece.

  The soundtrack mixes classical compositions, e.g. “Also Sprach Zarathustra” by Richard Strauss, with four creepy modernistic compositions by György Ligeti. The parts of the movie that utilize the latter pieces really evoke an unsettling sense of the unknown.

  My favorite part is the astronauts’ exchange with HAL, which involves almost an hour of the runtime and is the only part of the film that generates a low-key sense of suspense.

  Personally, I don’t believe that humankind began as apes (rolling my eyes). But, even if this were true, where did the apes come from? Did they just spontaneously manifest by accident? If so, when? How? Biogenesis is a scientific axiom meaning “life proceeds from life.” So what life form originally created the apes or the simple organisms that supposedly evolved into apes?

  The film runs 2 hours, 29 minutes.

  GRADE: A-/B+