The horror genre has always been a favorite, consistently drawing larger audiences than many other film genres. Its appeal, however, often hinges on the strength of its concept and how daringly it challenges its viewers. Rebooting the 1941 classic The Wolf Man seemed like a promising idea—not because the original was a masterpiece, but because it provides a valuable opportunity for a new generation to experience what early cinema once offered. But does the reboot live up to its potential? Is it worth revisiting? The impressive cast certainly suggests so—but does the final product deliver?

The story follows Blake (Christopher Abbott), who relocates his family from the picturesque city of San Francisco to Oregon after the death of his father. Along with the emotional weight of this loss, Blake inherits his childhood home—an inheritance that comes with unexpected horrors. Shortly after arriving, Blake and his family are attacked by a werewolf. In an attempt to protect his family, Blake is bitten by the creature, unaware that this injury will change him forever. As night falls, the devoted father begins to transform into a monster. His wife, Charlotte (Julia Garner), is left to defend their child—not only from the feral werewolf but also from the man she once trusted to keep them safe.

Director Leigh Whannell, working alongside co-writer Corbett Tuck, attempts to recapture the visceral thrills of body horror. In many ways, the film succeeds in this effort. However, it lacks the energy and depth needed to make the story truly impactful. Blumhouse Productions has a reputation for delivering engaging and high-quality horror, yet Wolf Man feels like it falls short of that standard. The film struggles to connect emotionally with its audience, leaving viewers feeling detached from its events.

That’s not to say the film is without merit. There are moments that work well, and it’s clear some will find enjoyment in it. However, it fails to inspire. You might question whether inspiration should even be expected from a story about a man-turned-werewolf and a mother forced to protect her child from the father-turned-monster. It’s a valid point, but even within this familiar premise, there’s potential for more nuance. Unfortunately, Wolf Man rushes through its narrative, prioritizing a shorter runtime over proper character development and storytelling.

The cast, however, is a standout element. Christopher Abbott and Julia Garner deliver compelling performances, elevating the material as much as possible. The fault lies not with them but with the film’s lack of focus and pacing issues.

Ultimately, Wolf Man is the kind of film that will appeal to a specific audience, which is a success in its own way. However, it doesn’t achieve the staying power needed to become a classic or warrant repeated viewings. While this is just my take, if you find yourself enjoying it more than I did, then perhaps the film has fulfilled its purpose—for you, at least.