The Man from Earth

An impromptu goodbye party for Professor John Oldman becomes a mysterious interrogation after the retiring scholar reveals to his colleagues he never ages and has walked the earth for 14,000 years.

Credits: TheMovieDb.

Film Cast:

  • John Oldman: David Lee Smith
  • Dan: Tony Todd
  • Harry: John Billingsley
  • Edith: Ellen Crawford
  • Sandy: Annika Peterson
  • Linda Murphy: Alexis Thorpe
  • Art: William Katt
  • Dr. Will Gruber: Richard Riehle
  • Moving Man #1: Steven Littles
  • Moving Man #2: Chase Sprague
  • Officer: Robbie Bryan

Film Crew:

  • Executive Producer: Mark Pellington
  • Writer: Jerome Bixby
  • Editor: Neil Grieve
  • Producer: Richard Schenkman
  • Production Design: Priscilla Elliott
  • Executive Producer: Emerson Bixby
  • Producer: Eric D. Wilkinson
  • Original Music Composer: Mark Hinton Stewart
  • Director of Photography: Afshin Shahidi

Movie Reviews:

  • Andres Gomez: A great idea for a movie developed in a witty script. Well done and with a decent cast.

    Perfect for being played also in the theaters or watched under the blanket at home.

  • furious_iz: DON’T BELIEVE THE HYPE!

    Maybe that statement is a little facetious, but I feel it is true. I read **_AMAZING_** reviews for this film. I went in with high hopes, expecting a well acted, thoughtful, existential and quiet science fiction film.

    Instead I saw a film so poor I wondered what’s the scam here? How could this film possibly have a score in the high 7s.

    The premise is solid at first glance, but as the film moves along it delves deeper and deeper in to melodrama, and then eventually patronising and insulting trash. I am agnostic, but I found the religion bashing heavy handed and unnecessary.

    Most of the actors were doing the best they could with the script, but everything comes across flat and lifeless. None of the characters rang true. None of the dialogue sounded like how real people actually talk. If you want to make a science fiction film that shies away from special effects, and instead relies on realism and storytelling, you had better make the dialogue realistic, and the storytelling compelling. Sadly neither are found here.

    The look of the film, I get that it is a low budget film made on a single location, but the quality of the film stock! It may seem petty, but I could not get over the thought that I have seen better looking lifetime films. Honestly I have seen better looking daytime soaps from the 80s.

    Basically I don’t get why anyone would call this film good, let alone a masterpiece. I have read rave reviews, 10/10 reviews, gushing about how thought provoking and challenging this film was. My thoughts were ones of disdain. My challenge was to finish this abysmal film. Many of the reviews seem to fixate on the fact that the writer of this wrote for the original Star Trek series. That to me is not a good enough reason to rate this film highly.

    I honestly felt ripped off by this film. I’ve been told I didn’t get it, but sadly I did. I understood every scene, I understood the implications, I understood the moral dilemmas and deeper meaning of what was being said. It’s just that the deeper meaning was shallow and unconvincing. I’ve been told maybe I should have watched Transformers instead. Just for the record, I was looking forward to a slow, intelligent film minus explosions. Instead I got, this.

    3/10, avoid unless you have already drunk the kool-aid and are pre-conditioned to love the film because the writer worked on Star Trek.

  • niyumard: I’d like to invite you to **believe the hype**. This movie is very well written and simply great. Keeps you at the edge of your seat and doesn’t fail to amaze you till its very last second.

Leave a Reply

%d bloggers like this: